A heated debate has erupted over a proposed road closure between Sherford and Plympton, with locals fearing it will significantly impact their travel times and add congestion to already busy routes.
The plan, put forward by the Sherford Consortium, aims to permanently shut down a 282-metre stretch of road known as 'Road Past Vealeholme', connecting Main Street in Sherford to Plympton Hill. This decision, which ultimately rests with the Secretary of State for Transport, has sparked anger and confusion among residents, who have until the end of March to voice their opinions.
The consortium argues that the closure will alleviate pressure on rural roads in Plympton St Maurice and is a solution agreed upon with local authorities. They believe it will encourage motorists to use alternative routes, such as Deep Lane, and that planned improvements there will enhance traffic flow. However, locals like Barbara Gaze strongly disagree, claiming it will severely disrupt their daily lives and further congest the Deep Lane/A38 junction.
"My journey from Vinery Lane to Stanborough Cross used to be less than a mile, but with the proposed closure, it would be nearly four miles," Barbara explained. "It's an unnecessary burden on residents and will only add to the gridlock on Deep Lane."
Plymouth City Councillor Terri Beer, who has been trying to shed light on the matter, expressed her frustration at the lack of involvement from councillors. "It's caused confusion and concern, and generated a huge debate. We need to find a solution that works for everyone, not just push through decisions without proper consultation."
The impact of the proposed closure extends beyond travel times. With the expansion of Langage Industrial Estate and the development of Sherford, there are concerns about the lack of infrastructure to cope with the increased traffic. Local MP Rebecca Smith acknowledged these concerns, stating that the route is a vital connection for daily access to essential services.
"While discussions about this road link have been ongoing as part of the Sherford development plans, it's important to consider the impact on residents and ensure their views are heard. I'm working to obtain details of the traffic modelling and impact assessments to better understand the potential consequences."
Cllr Dan Thomas, leader of South Hams District Council, defended the proposal, stating it aligns with the Sherford masterplan and will eventually be replaced by new estate roads. He acknowledged the challenges residents face in accessing consultation details and assured that alternative routes to Bullers Hill would remain accessible.
"The original plan involved installing bollards at Bullers Hill, but as a short-term measure, the consortium has accelerated the closure process to address a legal obligation requested by Plymouth City Council. This is a complex issue, and we must find a balance between managing traffic flow and ensuring the development progresses smoothly."
The debate over this road closure highlights the delicate balance between urban development and the needs of local communities. It remains to be seen how the Secretary of State will rule, but one thing is certain: the decision will have a significant impact on the lives of those living in and around Sherford and Plympton.
